D.K.SETH
HARENDRA PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ALLAHABAD – Respondent
( 1 ) THE opposite party Nos. 2. 3 and 4 filed O. S. No. 842 of 1999 before the learned Additional civil Judge. IIIrd Court. Allahabad for the following reliefs :
(a) That by decree of mandatory injunction the defendants be directed not to transfer the plaintiffs from City Allahabad to any other city. (b) That the cost of the suit be awarded to the plaintiffs. (c) That any other and further reliefs be also awarded to the plaintiffs against the defendant which the Court deems fit and proper In the interest of justice.
( 2 ) IN connection with the said suit, the opposite parry Nos. 2. 3 and 4 had filed an application for injunction. By an order dated 28th July, 1999 notices were directed to be issued on the petitioner, while the learned trial court was not satisfied that ad interim order could be issued before issuing the notice under Rule 3 of Order XXXIX. This order was challenged by the Opposite Party Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in Civil Revision No. 940 of 1999. The learned Additional District Judge, IInd Court, allahabad by an order dated 3rd August. 1999 had granted an ad interim injunction till 20th september, 1999 staying the operation of the transfer of the opposite party
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.