( 1 ) THE petitioner a diploma holder in textile after completing one months production training in u. P. Handloom Corporation Ltd. was appointed on probation as production inspector for one year on 22. 8. 83. He joined on 25. 8. 83 at Salon, district Raf-Bareilly. He was transferred by the managing director from Rai-Bareilly to Rishikesh. He was relieved by the project officer on 5. 1. 89. According to respondents, the petitioner got his transfer stayed. On 24/25. 1. 89 the petitioner was directed to report at Naogaon, Uttar Kashi. The petitioner sent applications for leave on 6. 1. 89, 11. 3. 89, 11. 5. 89, 12. 7. 89 and 14. 8. 89. He claims that he was patient of esonophilia which was cured to targe extent in 1982 but the hills were not suitable for his health. The respondents dispute the receipt of applications for leave. It is also claimed that the petitioner was directed to get himself examined by the Chief Medical Officer but he did not comply. The respondents informed the petitioner on 10. 7. 89 to join the duty. But the petitioner instead of joining sent the application for leave. Since the petitioner did not join, the respondent published a notice in newsp