D.P.GARG, V.K.CHATURVEDI
FIROZ AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) - In this Habeas Corpus writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the subject matter of challenge is the order of detention dated 29-1-1999. Annexure-1 of the writ petition passed by the District Magistrate. Varanasi-respondent No. 2 by invoking the provisions of Section 3 (2) of the National Security Act. 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The said order was approved by the State Government-respondent No. 1 on 6-2-1999. The petitioner made a representation dated 11-2-1999 through the Jail Superintendent-respondent No. 3, which was sent to the State Government by - the District Magistrate respondent No. 2 on 16-2-1999. The representation of the petitioner was rejected on 20-2-1999. After the receipt of the recommendations of the Advisory Board, the respondent No. 1-confirmed the detention order on 5- 3-1999. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. Heard Mr. Vinod Prasad learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mahendra Pratap learned A. G. A appearing on behalf of the respondents.
( 2 ) THOUGH the detention order has been challenged on a variety of grounds. Mr. Vinod Prasad appearing on behalf of the petitioner, howev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.