SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 80

A.CHAKRABARTI
PAWAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Hoopendra Nath Singh, S.P.MEHROTRA

A. CHAKRABARTI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order dated June 14, 1994 and July 16, 1994 transferring the petitioner from Harduaganj.

( 2 ) THE case made out in the writ petition in brief is as follows:

( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed on the post of Chemist Grade-II on August 12, 1977 and was regularised on the post by memorandum dated January 21, 1994 with effect from August 12, 1982 and was confirmed with effect from April 1, 1986 by memorandum dated February 26, 1994. The petitioners service was meritorious and he was twice given the time-bound pay-scale. The petitioner is the General Secretary of the U. P. Vidyut Mazdoor Sangh which is a registered trade union and is affiliated to Bhartiya Mazdoor sangh a federation of Trade Unions duly recognised by Government of India. The respondent No. 6, the City President, Bahujan Samaj party by letter dated May 3, 1994 made false allegations against the petitioner to the Chief minister of the State. The substance of the allegations was harassing the members of the backward class and blackmail ing them. The said letter at Annexure 3 to the writ petition also enclosed a letter addressed to the Chief Minister dated May 1, 19













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top