B.S.CHAUHAN
RAJBIR SIGH – Appellant
Versus
PURUSHOTTAM LAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed the instant writ petition alleging that he had been the tenant in the premises in dispute for a long time and the landlord respondent No. 1 in collusion with respondent No. 3 the Police Inspector wanted to evict the petitioner forcibly from the said premises and in that apprehension the petitioner filed the case before the Munsif, Meerut praying that he should not be dispossessed from the premises in dispute without due process of law and in the meanwhile temporary injunction may be granted restraining respondents Nos. 1 and 3 from evicting the petitioner forcibly. But the petitioner had been evicted forcibly by the said respondents.
( 2 ) IN the aforesaid writ petition this Court vide its order dated 30-5-95 directed the District Magistrate, Meerut respondent No. 5, to take appropriate action for restoring the possession of the petitioner within a week of producing the certified copy of the said order before him by the petitioner. The aforesaid order was passed on the submission on behalf of the petitioner that in spite of the order of the Civil Court dated 9-5-1995 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) the petitioner a tenant, had been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.