SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 980

R.A.SHARMA, O.P.JAIN
RAM LAKHAN PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
DISTT. ASSTT, REGISTRAR, CO-OP. SOCIETY, KANPUR CITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.Tripathi

R. A. SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER, who an employee of Hindustan Commercial bank, retired in 1978 form sevice on attaining the age of 60 years. Thereafter he was as Secretary of Bank Karamchari Co-operative Credit society, Birhana Road. Kanpur on fixed honorarium of Rs 500 per month. By order 20-12-1983 he was suspended on account of certain charges of misconduct. Being aggrieved by it he filed this writ petition in 1990.

( 2 ) LEAREND counsel for the respondent No. 3 has a preliminary objection to the effect that this writ petition is not maintainable, because of the fact that the Co-operative Society of which the petitioner was the secretary was not a statutory authority and there was no statutory rules and reputations governing his condition of service. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stater) that the petitioners society is a central and, therefore, the conditions of service are governed by statutory regulation. This contention of the learned counsel is devoid of merit.

( 3 ) central Society has been defined by Section 2 (d-1) of the U. P. Co-operative Societes Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), according to which Central Society or Central Co-operative society mean




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top