SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1254

B.S.CHAUHAN
SICHAI MAZDOOR SANGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan

B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE instant writ petition has been filed by Sichai Mazdoor Sangh, a registered union, on behalf of its 29 members, i. e. , part-time Tube-well operators of district Aligarh. Itraises various issues and several reliefs have been claimed. Shri B. D. Mandhyan, learned Counsel for the petitioner has restricted his submission only for the claim of equal pay for equal work and no other issue has been agitated by him.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claimed that though the members of the Sangh are called part-time Tube-well operators, they work equal to the work done by the full time Tube-well operators and thus they are entitled for the similar treatment as was given to the full-time Tube-well operators.

( 3 ) IN the case of State of Punjab v. Surendra Kumar AIR 1992 SC 1593, the Apex Court has dealt with the case of the part-time teachers and observed as under. "it is also not suggested that the respondents accepted the terms set out in Annexure P/1 and P/2 under mistake. We, therefore, do not find any reason as to why the specific terms on which the appointments were made could not be enforced. "

( 4 ) SHRI Mandhyan has most articulatedly argued that the ratio of the afore










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top