SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 204

O.P.GARG
SANJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
HEMANT KISHORE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Prabhakar, PRAMOD JAIN

O. P. GARG, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against the order dated 19. 1. 1998 passed by Sri R. H. Zaldi, civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut whereby impleadment applications moved by the revisionists in Original Suit No. 942 of 1986 have been rejected. Heard Sri A. D. Prabhakar and sri Pramod Jain, learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) ORIGINAL Suit No. 942 of 1986 was instituted by Hemant Kishore and two others for the relief of partition of the properties as have been described in Schedule a of the plaint and for possession over half of their share ; for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating or transferring half share of the plaintiffs in the suit property and for rendition of accounts. Brij Raj Kishore and his son Vijay Kumar are defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the suit. The suit has reached almost at the stage of its conclusion as arguments have been heard after recording the evidence of the parties and the case was reserved for judgment. It was at this stage that the present applicants, who are the wife, son and daughter of defendant Vijay Kumar moved applications for their impleadment under Order I, Rule 10 (2) read with Section 151 of the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top