SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1190

O.P.GARG
ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
KAMESHWAR NATH AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.KAND PAL, G.N.Verma

O. P. GARG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs Second Appeal arising out of Suit No. 290 of 1997 which was instituted for the reliefs

(1) cancellation of the sale deed dated 8. 2. 1996 executed by Smt. Shanti devi-defendant No. 3. Radhey Shyam and Santosh Kumar, defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of kameshwar Nath-defendant No. 4 ; (2) for cancellation of the gift deed dated 24. 8. 1967 executed by Kameshwar Nath defendant No. 4 in favour of his son Rajesh Kumar-defendant No. 5 and, (3) for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant Nos. 4 and 5 from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs over the disputed grove existing in plot Nos. 906m, area 0. 533 acres and 906-M area. 35 acres, total. 68 acres, situate in village Bailjery of Tahsil Kashipur, in district nainital (now Udham Singh Nagar ).

( 2 ) THE suit of the plaintiffs was decreed by the trial court on 16. 8. 1975. The defendant Nos. 4 and 5 preferred an appeal (No. 72 of 1975) which was allowed reversing the decree passed by the trial court and the suit was dismissed.

( 3 ) THIS Second Appeal was admitted and the following subatantial question of law was framed for determination by this Court :


"whether the sale effected





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top