SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1295

D.S.SINHA, R.K.SINGH
JAMILUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
SHAMSUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL DAYAL, DINESH RAI DEWEDI, HAIDAR HUSAIN, K.M.Dayal, L.M.Singh, R.K.ASTHANA, S.M.A.MAJID

D. S. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Haidar Husain, learned counsel appearing for the defendant-revisionist and Sri K. M. Dayal, Senior Advocate, appearing for the plaintiff-opposite party.

( 2 ) WHILE hearing this revision, a learned Single Judge concluded that on the question whether one common suit for eviction of a tenant from two separate tenements is maintainable there is dissonance between the two single Judge decisions rendered in Ram Chandra v. Judge, Small Cause Court, Farrukhabad, reported in (1984) 1 All Rent Cas 138 : (1984 All LJ 143) and Smt. Samundari Devi v. Shanti Prakash Gupta, reported in 1986 (UP) RCC 561. According to the learned single Judge, views similar to the one expressed in the case of Smt. Samundari Devi v. Shanti Prakash Gupta (supra) were also expressed by another Single Judge in Devesh Chandra Gupta v. Dina Nath, reported in (1992) 1 All Rent Cas 3 : (AIR 1992 All 115 ).

( 3 ) THEREFORE, at the behest of the learned single Judge, the matter has been referred to this Bench by the order of the Honble the Chief Justice dated 12-4-1997 for resolving the discord.

( 4 ) IN Ram Chandra v. Judge, Small Cause Court (supra) it has been held by the learned single J












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top