SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 78

SUDHIR NARAIN
HET RAM KANODIA – Appellant
Versus
10th ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KANPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.GROVER

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 28/08/1991 passed by the Additional Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar (respondent No. 2) allowing the amendment application filed by respondent No. 3 and the order dated 6/08/1993 passed by respondent No. 1 affirming the said order in revision.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 3 filed S. C. C. Suit No. 751 of 1980 in the Court of Judge Small Causes, Kanpur Nagar against respondents No. 4 to 10 and the petitioner on the allegation that the disputed accommodation was under the tenancy of the Purhwal Mills Co. Ltd. which was taken over by the U. P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. (respondent No. 4 ). The defendants No. 1 to 4 in the suit illegality and without the consent and permission of the plaintiff sublet the accommodation to defendant Nos. 5 to 8. The petitioner was impleaded as defendant No. 7 in the Suit.


( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the Suit the plaintiff filed an application for amendment in the plaint. It was stated that the petitioner illegally sublet the accommodation to Sri Shiv Kumar Awasthi, Sri Umashankar Mishra and Sri Ramkishan Kanodia and has also made substantial and material alteration and additio























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top