B.L.YADAV
NATTHU – Appellant
Versus
AMAR NATH AGARWAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE ambit, co nstruction and effect of fourth proviso of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act 1972, Act 13 of 1972 (The Act for short) read with R. 16 (2) (a) of the Rules framed under the Act, in granting or refusing the application for release under S. 21 (1) (a) of the Act, is one of the questions that falls for determination in the present petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution by the tenant against whom the prescribed authority has allowed the application for release and the Appellate Court has affirmed that order. The prayer is that these impugned orders be quashed by issuing a writ of certiorari.
( 2 ) PORTRAYAL of the essential facts are these. The respondent No. 1 is the landlord of a shop 38 x 11 boundaries indicated in para 1 of the application of the respondent No. 1 situate in Mohalla Railway Ganj, Hardoi and the petitioner is tenant and runs a cycle repairing shop. As the landlord was employed in Military Engineering Service, he wants to set up his own business of refrigerator after retirement on 5-11-1985. He moved application under S. 21 (1) (a) of the Act (Annexure- 1) for release as his needs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.