SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 229

N.L.GANGULY, VINEET SARAN
HAJI PEER BUX – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


VIRENDRA SARAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS Haji Peer Bux alias Saleem Lala and Fazloo alias Saghir Haji alias Saghir Jamal who are father and son respectively have filed this petition for quashing the First Information Report dated 18-3-1993 lodged by Mohd. Saleem and registered as Crime No. 45 of 1993, U/s. 394/307, IPC of P. S. Chaman Ganj, District Kanpur Nagar and S. 3/5 Explosive Act.

( 2 ) WE have gone through the First Information Report and other materials placed on the record and have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel.

( 3 ) WE are of the opinion that it is not a fit case in which this Court may exercise its discretion under Art. 226 of the Constitution to quash the FIR.


( 4 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners, however, prayed that a direction be issued by this Court that when the petitioners surrender and make application for bail, their bail application may be considered on the same day and in case the hearing or the disposal of the bail application is adjourned, the petitioners may be released on their executing personal bound till such adjourned date. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that the FIR allegations that

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top