SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 240

M.L.BHAT
NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SUKUMAR CHAND JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJENDRA KUMAR, VINOD BISHNOI

M. L. BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Civil First Appeal against the judgment of the III Addl. District Judge, Meerut dated 28-1-1992 whereby Court below was allowed the application filed by the defendant-respondents under O. 7, R. 11, C. P. C. and has rejected the plaint under the said order. The plaintiff-appellants are aggrieved against the said order and they seek setting aside of the said order through the medium of this appeal.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the controversy and for the just disposal of this appeal it is necessary to give a brief history of the case as emerge from the pleadings of the parties before the Court below.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff-appellants seem to have made an application under S. 18 of the Religious Endowments Act of 1863, hereinafter called as the Act, for permission to file a suit under S. 14 of the said Act. The permission was granted to the appellants to file the suit by a written order dated 24-7-1991 by the District Judge. As a result of this order the plaintiff-appellants had filed the suit against the respondents before the Court below under S. 14 of the Act. The written statement was filed by the answering defendants to the suit. The suit is in relation to a tem






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top