( 1 ) BY means of this revision the revisionists have challenged an order dated 26-8-1993 passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Unnao summoning the revisionists under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The facts which are relevant for deciding the present controversy are that one Suryanarain, the father of deceased Rani, lodged a written report on 5-7-1992 with the allegations that his daughter, Rani, was married to Kashi Din about six years back. After some days of the marriage his daughter complained to him that she is being assaulted and tortured. She is also given mental torture by saying that she has not brought anything from her parents during the marriage. The complainant talked to the in-laws of his daughter but the matter could not be settled. About two months back the mother-in-law and sister-in-law (Nanand) of his daughter came and took away his daughter after getting the Bida done. On 5-7-1992 at about 8 a. m. Prem Narain, brother-in-law (Devar) and Ram Pasi informed the complainant that his daughter had died. On receiving this information he went to the place of his Samdhi and found that his daughter had died. From the body symptoms it