SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 363

N.L.GANGULY
K. L. VIRMANI – Appellant
Versus
IIIRD ADDITIONAL DIST. JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADITYA NARAIN

N. L. GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a tenant of premises 3, Convent Road Dehradun. Smt. Sarla Devi Sharma is the owner/land-lady of the house. Towards east of the said accommodation exists a servant tenament after the boundary wall where three opening for outlet for water, rain and flood water used to flow since long. The servient tenaments (premises 35/1 had always been on lower level than that of dominant tenament. The respondent No. 3, Dr. M. Singh, started raising constructions over the servient tenament in the month of November, 1982, through architect Sri S. A. Khan who was his agent. The petitioner apprehended that the three existing out lets in the boundary-wall openings to the servient tenament was going to be closed by respondent. A civil suit was thus filed by the petitioner impleading Dr. M. Singh as defendant No. 1 and S. A. Khan as defendant No. 2 seeking injunction restraining the defendants Nos. 1 and 2 for closing or disturbing the flow of the water of the dominant tenament through the three outlets in the eastern boundry-wall. The petitioner is a tenant in the premises in question i. e. the dominant tenement since 1955. The allegation in the plaint was that














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top