S.R.SINGH
MAHENDRA PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
2nd ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, DEHRADUN – Respondent
( 2 ) THE matrix of the facts, in so far as it may be found relevant for the purposes of discussion of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, is set out as below. Late Sri K. R. Bahuguna, father of the respondent No. 3 was, admittedly, the owner and landlord of the building in question, He sold the building to one M/s. Nahar Singh, Kishan Chand by means of a registered sale deed
Dhoom Chand Jain v. Chaman Lal Gupta
REFERRED TO : Hub Chand v. Hazara Begum
N.M. Ponniah v. Kamalakshmi Ammal
Kundan Lal v. Jagannath Sharma
SriShyam Kishore v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
S. Sunderan v. V.R. Pattabhiraman
Anand Nivas Pvt. Ltd. v. Anandji Kalyanjis Pedhi Murlidhar v. State of U.P.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Delhi Transport Corporation Mazdoor Congress
Krishna Kumar Khemka v. Grindlays Bank plc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.