SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 281

U.C.SRIVASTAVA, S.H.A.RAZA
NATHANIEL MASIH – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH SCHEDULED CASTE FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Mannan, ASHOK SRIVASTAVA, K.S.PATHAK, S.C.Misra

U. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE order of termination of services of the petitioner from the post of driver passed by the managing Director of the U. P. Scheduled Caste Finance and Development Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) is subject-matter of challenge in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was initially appointed as driver in the Corporation and was drawing salary of less than Rs. 500 per month. His services were terminated by giving him one months salary. The petitioner has challenged the said order on the ground that he is workman and the opposite party no, 1 being industry the provisions of Sections 25-F, 25-N and 25-G of the Industrial Disputes act (which are analogous to Section 6 of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act) are attracted and as the petitioner has completed more than 240 days of continuous service and juniors to him have been retained, his termination amounts to retrenchment without following the provisions of industrial Disputes Act.

( 3 ) ON behalf of the Corporation a counter-affidavit has been filed and it has been pleaded that the petitioner has no right to file a writ petition after a period of one year and alternative re













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top