SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 253

S.R.BHARGAVA
VISHWA NATH – Appellant
Versus
MUNSIF LOWER CRIMINAL COURT, BAHRAICH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anand Mohan, ANIL RAI, RAZA ZAHIR, S.K.Kalia

S. R. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE petition, under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has arisen from a complaint.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS Vishwa Nath Jiloka, Amar Nath Jiloka and Sharnbhoo Nath Jiloka are real brothers and are residents of Patna. Opposite party No. 2 Prem Marain Pandey is a resident of Bahraich. Opposite Party No. 2 Prem Narain Pandey filed a criminal complaint against the petitioners for offences under Section 420/406 I. P. C. with the allegations that on 14th June, 1986 he met the petitioners at Nanpara Railway Station and during talks petitioners introduced themselves to him. They represented themselves to be respectable Brahmins and told the purpose of their visit as search of a groom for their daughter. Opposite party No. 2 believed the representation of the petitioners and told them about Narendra Kumar, unmarried brother of his brother-in-law gainer (sic ). They talked about mutually seeing the girl and the boy on 15th June, 1986. On that day, opposite party No. 2 along with his family members and the proposed boy reached Dalmia Dharamshala where petitioners along with the girl were present. After approval of the boy and the girl by the respective parties, the boy made gift of a rin






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top