SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 82

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, G. D. DUBEY
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
UNITED MOTOR TRANSPORT SERVICE ASSOCIATION – Respondent


B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, CJ.

( 1 ) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question under section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue :

"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal in law, justified in taking into consideration the depreciation suffered by the buses in question in estimating the net taxable income?"

( 2 ) THE respondent-assessee did not file any returns for the assessment years 1951-52 to 1956-57. However, on the basis of certain material, the Income-tax Officer initiated proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. wherein it was claimed that the buses belonged to the members individually, and that no income arising from the plying of those buses was assessable in the hands of the assessee. Its case was that the income of each bus should be assessed separately in the hands of its respective owner. This case was, however, rejected and assessment was made treating the respondent as an unregistered firm. On appeal, the Appellate assistant Commissioner reduced the quantum but rejected the claim for depreciation to be forwarded by the assessee. On further appe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top