B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, G. D. DUBEY
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
UNITED MOTOR TRANSPORT SERVICE ASSOCIATION – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question under section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue :
"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal in law, justified in taking into consideration the depreciation suffered by the buses in question in estimating the net taxable income?"
( 2 ) THE respondent-assessee did not file any returns for the assessment years 1951-52 to 1956-57. However, on the basis of certain material, the Income-tax Officer initiated proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. wherein it was claimed that the buses belonged to the members individually, and that no income arising from the plying of those buses was assessable in the hands of the assessee. Its case was that the income of each bus should be assessed separately in the hands of its respective owner. This case was, however, rejected and assessment was made treating the respondent as an unregistered firm. On appeal, the Appellate assistant Commissioner reduced the quantum but rejected the claim for depreciation to be forwarded by the assessee. On further appe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.