SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 299

V.N.KHARE, H.C.MITTAL
TRILOKI NATH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.MATHUR

V. N. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) SINCE common questions of fact and law in this writ petition and in the connected writ petitions are involved, we propose to decide these writ petitions by a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4215 of 1990 is an Advocate and was appointed as a District Government Counsel (Civil), Basti on 7-4-1983 for a period of one year. His appointment as District Government Counsel (Civil) Basti is alleged to have been extended from time to time, the last extension being for a period from 1-7-1989 to 30-6-1992.

( 3 ) PETITIONER No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 4392 of 1990 is an Association duly registered with the Registrar of Societies, Chits and Firms, U. P. Lucknow-W, known as U. P. Government Counsel (Criminal) Welfare Association, Meerut Branch, District Courts, Meerut (hereinafter referred to as an association ). The Association is said to be a State Level Organisation of Public Prosecutors and Additional Public Prosecutors appointed under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure having its headquarter at Bareilly. Petitioner No. 2 is its Secretary.


( 4 ) IN Writ Petition No. 4214 of 1990 petitioner No. 2 was appointed as District Government Co























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top