SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 606

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, R. R. MISRA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
NAGARMAL BISHESHAR LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Kumar Agrawal

R. R. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Allahabad, the Income-tax Appellate tribunal, B-Bench, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court: "whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the order rejecting the application for registration on the ground that it was belated was an order under Section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and was, therefore, appealable ?"

( 2 ) THE necessary facts leading to the above question are as follows : For the assessment year 1974-75, the assessee-firm made a claim for registration under Section 185 of the Income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The accounting year of the assessee ended on august 5, 1973, The assessee, however, filed an application in Forms Nos. 11 and 11a on september 14, 1973, along with the original partnership deed. Since the claim for registration was filed by the assessee after the close of the accounting period, the Income-tax Officer considered the same to be belated. On a show-cause notice being issued, the assessee explained that one of its partners, Sri Nagarrnal, had sudde














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top