( 1 ) THIS petition for a writ of habeas corpus was presented initially on behalf of five individuals. Subsequently, two petitioners withdrew from the array of petitioners and, as a result, upon a motion made in that behalf by their counsel, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn on their behalf. That left only three petitioners out of whom Raghuvir Singh has, according to the information conveyed to the Court by the learned Additional Government Advocate, since been released. Thus, only two petitioners, namely, Darshan Singh Yadav and Hargovind Singh Yadav remain in the field. 1a. At the outset we may mention that Sri P. P. Yadav, learned counsel representing these two petitioners conceded that in this petition neither the orders of remand nor the extension thereof passed from time to time by the Judicial Magistrate u/s. 167 (2) Cr. P. C. taking them in judicial custody are being challenged. The submission in the main was that even if their detention was initially valid being supported by valid remand orders their continued detention was rendered illegal as a result of their transfer from the District Jail at Etawah to the Jails of other districts. It was urged th