SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 854

R.B.MEHROTRA
MAJOR ASHOK KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
VITH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Yogesh Agarwal

R. B. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order of the II Munsif Magistrate, Varanasi, dated 8th of March, 1989 and the order of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Varanasi, dated 19/01/1990, dismissing the petitioners revision filed against the order of the 11 Munsif Magistrate, Varanasi allowing the application of Smt. Geeta Singh, under S. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

( 2 ) IT is not disputed in the present case that Smt. Geeta Singh was a legally wedded wife of the petitioner and the petitioner married Smt. Geeta Singh on 22-11-1981. Thereafter Smt. Geeta Singh stayed with the petitioner at Sultanpur and lived there for sometime and then returned to her parents house at Varanasi. She again went to petitioners house at Mhow (Madhya Pradesh), where the petitioner was posted as a Captain and lived with him for few months.

( 3 ) THE case of Smt. Geeta Singh, the wife of the petitioner, who has been arrayed as respondent No. 3 in the petition, is that the petitioner in the month of November. 1982 took her to her parents house and left there and thereafter she is not being maintai















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top