SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 26

K.P.SINGH, A.BANERJI
SATBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.KAPUR, M.D.CHAUBEY, R.TIWARI

K. P. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS in these writ petitions have sought quashing of the same notifications under Ss. 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 whereby they have been deprived of their plots. Since the same notifications and common questions of law and facts are involved in the cases, therefore, all these writ petitions are being decided by a common judgement. The counsel for the parties have agreed for decision of these writ petitions on merits at the stage of admission, therefore, we have proceeded to decide these writ petitions under Chap. XXI I Proviso to Rule 2 of the Rules of the Court.

( 2 ) NOTIFICATION No. 3058/xi-5-85-II (4) Land Acquisition Act relates to notification under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and was published in the Gazette on 11-6-1985 whereas notification No. 3637/xi-5-85-11- (4) Land Acquisition Act relates to, notification under S. 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and was published in the Gazette on 13-6-1985. The notification under S. 4 of the Act was published in daily newspapers on 19-7-1985 and the notification under S. 6 of the Act was published in newspapers on 25-7-1985 but the substance of the two notifications was given at conv































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top