SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R. M. SAHAI, K. P. SINGH, J. N. DUBEY
PARAS NATH - Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. - Respondents
W. P. 1120 Of 1977
Decided On : 07/19/1985

Advocates Appeared:
G.N.VARMA, Sankatha Rai

A sub-tenant of a fixed rate tenant who plants trees either with permission or otherwise and converts land into grove land which continues to be so on the date of vesting becomes Asami of it.

Headnote:

UPZA and LR Act - Section 19(b) - Interpretation - Sub-tenant of fixed rate tenant with specific authorization to plant grove becomes Asami under Section 21(1)(b) of UPZA and LR Act - Key legal principle: A sub-tenant of a fixed rate tenant who plants trees either with permission or otherwise and converts land into grove land which continues to be so on the date of vesting becomes Asami of it.

Fact of the Case:

Paras Nath and Kedar Nath, fixed rate tenants, planted a grove on plots 1367/1, 1367/2, and 1371/1, which were sublet to Nanak Chand and Raj Deo's father. They claimed that as sub-tenants of grove land, they were liable to ejectment under Section 202 read with Section 19(b) of the Act. Nanak Chand contested the suit, claiming that the land was sublet to his father, who planted the trees, making them Sirdars.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that a sub-tenant of land who plants trees either with permission or otherwise and converts land into grove land which continues to be so on the date of vesting becomes Asami of it. The court found that plots 1367/1 and 1367/2 were grove land on the relevant date, making the opposite parties Asamis. However, there was no evidence to establish that plot No. 1371/1 was a grove.

Issues: Whether a sub-tenant of a fixed rate tenant who plants trees and converts land into grove land becomes an Asami under Section 19(b) of the UPZA and LR Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 19(b) of the UPZA and LR Act, holding that a sub-tenant of a fixed rate tenant who plants trees either with permission or otherwise and converts land into grove land which continues to be so on the date of vesting becomes Asami of it. The court reasoned that if the land due to planting of trees stands converted and becomes grove land on the date of vesting, the sub-tenant cannot be deemed a sub-tenant of land, as it would result in conferring on him rights of Sirdar, which is a better right under the Z. A. Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed both writ petitions, quashing the orders of the Board of Revenue and the Additional Commissioner. The Additional Commissioner was directed to decide the appeal afresh, applying the law as indicated by the court.

R. M. SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) HAVING felt doubtful about the principle of law laid down in Lalit Tewari v. Genda Tewari, 1974 Unreported Rev. Cas. 318, that a sub-tenant of a fixed rate tenant with specific authorisation to plant grove would become Asami u/s. 21 (1) (b) of UPZA and LR Act of 1951 a provision in pari materia with S. 19 (b) of U. P. Urban ZA and LR Act (hereinafter referred to as Act), one of us (Honble K. P. Singh, J), referred this petition directed against order of Board of Revenue and others arising out of proceedings started for eviction u/s 202 of the Act for decision by a larger bench.

( 2 ) PRIOR to narration of facts it may be examined who are those persons who would become Asamis under sub-cl. (b) of Section 19 of Act. But before doing so it would be better if import of similar provision in ZA and LR Act (Act 1 of 1951) is understood. It is well known that when Zamindari was abolished the Legislature substituted seven classes of tenants under U. P. Tenancy Act besides Sir and Khudkast holder with three tenure holders known as Bhumidhar, Sirdar and Assami. Bhumidhari rights were conferred on these tenants who under U. P. Tenancy Act could be termed as superior class of tenants. Under this Act also their status was maintained by granting them absolute rights including right to transfer, gift or will. Sirdari rights were conferred on tenants who were to say second grade tenants. The Act while granting them absolute rights in land did not confer any right of transfer etc. The third category of tenants consisted of those persons to whom the land was let out and they were known as sub-tenants, tenants of sir or non-occupancy tenants. They had no security of tenure and were exposed to ejectment. Out of this category the Zamindari Abolition Act conferred rights of Adhivasi on tenants of Sir, sub-tenants, recorded occupants of 1356 and those who were in cultivatory possession in 1359. In 1954 even this class was made sirdar. They were rendered immune from eviction and were entitled to retain possession. And in case they were not in possession they were entitled to regain possession under Section 232 of Zamindari Abolition Act. But if they held land of a person who was disabled within the meaning of S. 157 of Zamindari Abolition Act then they were conferred rights of Asami u/s21 and were liable to ejectment. But no sub-tenant or recorded occupant of grove land could become adhivasi. Other non-occupancy tenants who were tenants of such lands in which hereditary rights could not accrue under Tenancy Act because they were lands of public utility or pasture land or land covered with water etc. in which casual and seasoned cultivation was done or were mortgagees of superior tenants or non occupancy tenants of intermediary grove land or sub-tenants of grove land were conferred rights of assami u/s. 21 of Zamindari Abolition Act. Such persons were liable to ejectment. When Urban Area Zamindari Abolition Act was enacted the same scheme was adhered to. Although the class of Adhivasis was obliterated but by separate sub-sec. (2) added to Section 19 all those persons who were tenants of Sir or sub-tenants were made Sirdars. Thus sub-section like S. 20 of Z. A. Act 1 of 1951 provided that a person shall become Sirdar only if he did not become Assami under S. 19. Section 19 of the Act like S. 21 of Zamindari Abolition Act confers right of Assami on a person covered in it irrespective of other provisions of the Act. Therefore, this section has an overriding effect and any person covered in various sub-clauses of this section shall be conferred with right of Assami. The opening part of the section reads as under :-notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, every person, who on the date immediately preceding date of vesting occupied or held in an Agricultural Area as (A ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (B) a sub-tenant of grove land. (c) to (h ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . shall be deemed t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top