SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 280

B.D.AGRAWAL
PUNWASI – Appellant
Versus
SUKHA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJ JAIN, Sankatha Rai, V.B.SINGH

B. D. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THE question raised in this appeal under O. XLIII, R. 1 (u) Civil P. C. directed against the order of the Additional District Judge, Varanasi, dated May 29, 1984, is short, but of some importance.

( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 (Smt. Sukha Devi) instituted Original Suit No. 63 of 1980 in the Court of Munsif City, Varanasi, for partition in respect of a dwelling house, situate in a mohalla of that city. The house, it is alleged, belonged to Shiva Bhikh, who died leaving his son Bhagelu. The death of Bhagelu took place on Aug. 5, 1979. He left behind two sons, namely, Punwasi (the appellant), the respondent No. 2 (Banarasi) and one daughter, namely, Smt. Sukha Devi (plaintiff-respondent No. 1 ). The share claimed by the plaintiff in the house is one third. The averment in the plaint also is that she gave notice to the defendants on Nov. 22, 1979, but they did not divide the house and hence the action for partition. The defendants, arrayed to the suit, were the present appellant and the respondent no. 2. The appellant resisted the suit on ground, inter alia, that this was not maintainable at the instance of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 2 defend


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top