SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 15

N.C.MUKHERJI, M.M.DUTT
ARUN KUMAR SANYAL – Appellant
Versus
JNANENDRA NATH SANYAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKIM CHANDRA DUTT, RANJIT KUMAR BANERJEE, SAILENDRA BHUSAN BAKSHI, Syama Prasanna Roy Choudhury

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff and it arises out of a suit for declaration of the plaintiffs title to the disputed property and partition of the same by metes and bounds.

( 2 ) THE appeal involves a point of law of first impression relating to the construction of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The point is whether a transferee of the female heirs is entitled to claim partition of the dwelling house when the male heir does not choose to divide his share therein. In other words, whether the restriction imposed by Section 23 on a female heir to claim partition also applies to her transferee. In order to appreciate and consider the point, the facts of the case may be stated in brief.

( 3 ) THE disputed property which is the dwelling house belonged to the father of the appellant, late Motilal Sanyal. He died intestate on May 30, 1960 leaving behind him his widow Khiroda Sundari Dasi, two sons, namely, the appellant and the respondent No. 1 and three daughters, Atasi, Anima and Anurupa, as his heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Each of the said heirs inherited l/6th share in the disputed dwelling house. The appellant transf











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top