SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 123

O.P.SAXENA
A. S. SANYAL – Appellant
Versus
KHEM CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.Sanyal, K.C.DHUTIYA, KHEM CHAND, Palok Basu

0. P. SAXENA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a criminal revision and connected criminal miscellaneous application under section 481, Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 12-1-1983 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh is Criminal Revision No. 18 of 1982, A. S. Nayal and two others v. State and another.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this revision and connected criminal miscellaneous application are that Khem Chand is employed as a driver in the Collectorate in district Pithoragarh. A. S. Nayal, Kunal Sharma and Sabhajit Shukla are Executive Magistrates posted in district Pithoragarh. On 19/10/1981 Khem Chand filed a complaint against A. S. Nayal and two other Executive Magistrates for offences under sections 323, 394, 504 and 506 Indian Penal Code said to have been committed on 10-9-1981 at 8. 15 P. M. It was alleged that the accused abused, threatened and beat the complainant and robbed him of Rs. 3,000. 00 on account of a suspicion that he had earlier made a complaint against them to the District Magistrate. She statement of Khem Chand was recorded under section 200, Criminal Procedure Code on the same days. P. W. 1 Murli Dhar, P. W. 2 Lalta Prasad and P. W. 3 Govind Cha






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top