SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 388

N.N.MITHAL
RAJ NARAIN PRATAP NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SINGH, S.P.GUPTA, Vishnu Sahai


N. N. MITHAL, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision is directed against the order passed by the court below rejecting the plaintiffs application for issue of temporary injunction in the proceedings under Section 20 of the arbitration Act.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case are that the plaintiff entered into a special agreement with the U. P. State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on 26-9-1979 for supply of electricity to its Roller Flour Mill. A sum of Rs. 55,100/- was deposited as security and the board in pursuance of the agreement installed a meter for indicating units of electric power consumed, No other meter for indicating the maximum demand was, however, installed in the premises at that time. In the agreement one of the terms thereof related to settlement of disputes of certain nature through arbitration. The revisionist continued to pay all the charges in respect of the units consumed by it up to Apr. 1979 in accordance with the readings recorded by the meter. However, on 17-4-1979 the applicant received a bill for Rs. 7429-13p pertaining to the period from January, 76 to August, 77. Although the correctness and legality of this demand was disputed by th































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top