SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 564

P.N.GOEL
STATE – Appellant
Versus
CHHINGA – Respondent


P. N. GOEL, J.


( 1 ) THE memo of appeal along with application Under Section 378 (3, Cr. P. C. and another application Under Section 5, Limitation Act was filed before the Registrar on 3-4-1981 at his residence. The order of acquittal was passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Mathu-ra in s. T. 105 of 1980 on 3-12-1980. Application for copy of the order/judgment was moved on 12-12-1980, Notice of the preparation of the copy was given on 7-141981. Copy was actually taken on 14-1-1981, The office rightly reported that the memo of appeal and application Under section 378 (3, Cr. P. C. were filed beyond time by 4 days.

( 2 ) NOTICE of the application Under Section 5 62the Limitation Act was issued to the respondents opposite parties. One Alis Das, a pairokar of the respondents filed counter-affidavit. Sri Keshav sahay Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondents: Chhinga, respondent No. 1 filed another counter-affidavit. He was represented by Sri Tejpal, Advocate.

( 3 ) THE learned State counsel filed re-Joinder affidavit. In support of the application Under section 5 of the Limitation Act, Shitla Prasad Shukla, ah official in the office of the Government advocate, filed aff









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top