SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 102

D.S.MATHUR, GYANENDRA KUMAR
NAGAR MAHAPALIKA OF KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N.CHATURVEDI, N.D.Pant

MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 417 (3) Criminal Procedure Code by the Nagar Mahapalika kanpur, against the order dated 22-7-1961 of the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur, allowing the appeal of Sri Ram, respondent, and acquitting him of the offence punishable under section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (to be referred hereinafter as the Act) for contravention of Section 7 thereof.

( 2 ) THE facts, in brief, are that on 29-1-1960 the respondent, Sri Ram, was found selling laddoos in Mohalla Ashok Nagar of Kanpur City. The Food Inspector purchased laddoos and prepared three sealed samples thereof, one of which was sent to the Public Analyst for analysis and report, the other was handed over to the respondent and the third was retained in the office of the medical Officer of Health, Kanpur. The Public Analyst submitted his report (Ex. Ka-4) and expressed the opinion that the sample was coloured with a coal-tar dye, namely, metanil yellow, which was not one of the coal-tar dyes permitted for use in foodstuffs under Rule 28 of the prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1951 (to be referred hereinafter as the Rules ). The report of the Public Analys



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top