SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 135

S.N.KATJU
SHAKUNTALA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
BENI MADHAV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.KACKAR, Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar

S. N. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against an order of the Additional District Judge of Meerut dismissing the Applicants application under Section 85 of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act.

( 2 ) THE applicant Smt. Shakuntala Devi ia the widow of one Pundri Kaksh who died in 1947. Pundri Kaksh was possessed of Zamindari properties along with his brother Beni Madhav. The applicant was given compensation bonds of the amount of Rs. 10,000/- only in respect of the share of her husband in the aforesaid property but the balance of the compensation amount was withheld on the ground that she had a limited interest in the property. Subsequently she made an application to the Compensation Officer on 30-7-1956 claiming the balance of the amount of compensation on the ground that after the passing of the Hindu Succession Act (XXX of 1956} she had become full owner of the property left by her deceased husband and she was entitled to the balance of the compensation amount that had been withheld and had been deposited in the imperial Bank of India in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 69 and Rule 85 framed under the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act.

( 3 ) BENI Madhav opp















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top