SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 36

D.P.UNIYAL, T.RAMABHADRAN
AYUB – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.H.BEG

D. P. UNIYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE matter referred to us relates to the quantum of sentence that should ordinarily be awarded in respect of offences committed under the U. P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The question referred for our decision is as follows:

"should the object of the enactment alone be kept in mind while awarding sentence, or extraneous circumstances, e. g. , the likely consequences of an unlawful act, be also taken into consideration? Further, where the unlawful act is likely to cause the breach of peace, should the courts of law adopt a strict attitude by awarding a severe sentence, of course commensurate with the maximum penalty provided under the law?"

( 2 ) THERE has been a divergence of opinion among the Judges of this Court on the question of the measure of punishment that should be awarded in cases of cow slaughter. It is to resolve this difference of opinion that the above reference has been made. The Legislature has set forth the objects which prompted it to make the legislation on the subject of cow slaughter. The notification issued by the State Government explaining the aims and objects of the Act says that under Article 48 of the Constitution of India,
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top