SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 99

V.G.OAK
SHEO PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARI SVARUP, J.Swarup, Radha Krishna

V. G. OAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against an appellate order passed by the learned Additional district Judge, Moradabad under the Payment of Wages Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) SHEO Prasad petitioner was at one time a Railway employee. He was suspended on 14-3-48. An order for his removal was passed on 21-6-48, He instituted a civil suit for a declaration that his removal was wrongful. The civil court decreed the suit of the plaintiff for declaration on 21-9-55. The petitioner filed a claim before the City Magistrate, Moradabad on 1-3-56, claiming a sum of Rs. 12,576/11/, as arrears of his wages. This claim was resisted by the Railway administration. The City Magistrate returned the application on the ground that he had no jurisdiction. The same application was later presented before the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, bilari. He passed an order on 14-6-58 allowing the petitioners claim in part.

( 3 ) THE Union of India filed an appeal against the Claims Commissioners decision, dated 14-6-58. The appeal came up for disposal before the learned Additional District Judge, moradabad. He held that the claim presented by Sheo Prasad was barred by time. The


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top