SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 143

MITHAN LAL
SULTANUL ZAMAN – Appellant
Versus
HAMID UDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALESHVARI PRASAD, M.H.HUSSAIN

MITHAN LAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision filed by the defendant arises out of the following circumstances.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs brought a suit for partition of certain agricultural plots including a grove. The suit was decreed by the Munsif. A preliminary decree was passed and then the record was sent to the revenue court for preparation of the partition scheme. Thereafter an appeal was preferred by the defendant and the appellate Court modified the preliminary decree. On receipt of the partition scheme from the revenue Court the learned Munsif passed another order sending back the papers to the Revenue Court for the preparation of a fresh partition scheme according to the amended decree. A fresh partition scheme was received from the Revenue Court but no notice of it was given to the defendant or his counsel, and the learned Munsif passed a final decree in terms of the fresh partition scheme on 13-8-1957.

( 3 ) AN application was made by the defendant under Order 9, Rule 13, C. P. C. for the setting aside of the final ex parte decree, and the main contention was that tne final decree having been prepared without notice should be set aside. This application was made on 20-ll-1957,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top