MITHAN LAL
SULTANUL ZAMAN – Appellant
Versus
HAMID UDDIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS civil revision filed by the defendant arises out of the following circumstances.
( 2 ) THE plaintiffs brought a suit for partition of certain agricultural plots including a grove. The suit was decreed by the Munsif. A preliminary decree was passed and then the record was sent to the revenue court for preparation of the partition scheme. Thereafter an appeal was preferred by the defendant and the appellate Court modified the preliminary decree. On receipt of the partition scheme from the revenue Court the learned Munsif passed another order sending back the papers to the Revenue Court for the preparation of a fresh partition scheme according to the amended decree. A fresh partition scheme was received from the Revenue Court but no notice of it was given to the defendant or his counsel, and the learned Munsif passed a final decree in terms of the fresh partition scheme on 13-8-1957.
( 3 ) AN application was made by the defendant under Order 9, Rule 13, C. P. C. for the setting aside of the final ex parte decree, and the main contention was that tne final decree having been prepared without notice should be set aside. This application was made on 20-ll-1957,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.