SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 35

JAGDISH SAHAI
SHAUKAT HUSAIN BEG MIRZA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C.KHARE

JAGDISH SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has come to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the allegation that he retired from the service of the State of Uttar Pradesh as a jailer on 10-7-11956 and at the time of his retirement was receiving a salary of Rs. 325/- per mensem, After his retirement his papers were sent for fixation of his pension to the Accountant General, U. P. Under the orders of the Inspector General of Prisons dated 2-2-1951 the petitioners salary was fixed at Rs. 220/- p. m. , with effect from 1-4-1947. There was some dispute between him and the accountant General about the amount at which his pension was to be fixed. He filed a writ petition in this Court which was rejected having become infructuous because the Accountant general had decided the dispute that existed between him and the petitioner. The Accountant General fixed the petitioners salary at Rs. 210/- p. m. from 1-4-1947 and is proceeding to fix the petitioners pension on that basis. The petitioners case is that under Rule 4 (b) of the U. P. Revised Rates or Pay Rules, 1931 and paragraph 10 (2) of the Pay Committee report 1947 he was entitled to a higher salary and his pension sho











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top