SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 91

S.K.VERMA, B.R.JAMES
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
RANDHIR SRI CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shabd Saran, Suraj Nath Singh

( 1 ) RANDHIR, Tarif, Ram Prasad, Jaipal, Ram Narain and Ajab Singh were tried before the assistant Sessions Judge, Meerut, for offences under Sections 399 and 402,. P. C. on the ground that on the 16th September 1956 at Lisari Gate, Meerut city, they had made preparations for and assembled for committing dacoity. Randhir, Tarjf, Ram Narain and Ajab Singh were further charged under Section 19 (f) of the Arms Act with possession of unlicensed fire-arms. The learned Judge convicted these four under Section 19 (f) and awarded a sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/- each. But in respect of the major charges under Sections 399 and 402,. P. C. , he came to the conclusion that the evidence on the record was not sufficient to establish them, hence he acquitted all the accused of these charges. The State Government have preferred this appeal against the order of acquittal. We might state that the four men convicted under Section 19 (f), arms Act, appear to have submitted to their conviction and sentences for that offence.

( 2 ) IT is worth bearing in mind that except for the fact that Randhir and Jaipal are brothers, there is no apparent connection between the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top