SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 56

AGARWALA
NAGESHAR RAM – Appellant
Versus
BANSBAHADUR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D.Seth, Rajeshwari Prasad

AGARWALA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal arising oat of a suit (or three reliefs-- (a) for a declaration that the plots in suit (which are agricultural plots) be declared to be the joint family property of the plaintiffs and defendant 2 Chander Prasad, (b) that a lease dated 27th June 1942 executed by chander Prasad in favour of defendant 1 Bans Bahadur Singh be cancelled and (c) that possession over the plots in suit may be awarded to the plaintiffs. Both the Courts below have held that the plots in suit were the joint family property of the plaintiffs and defendant 2, and therefore they have granted a declaration to that effect to the plaintiffs, but the other two reliefs have not been granted. The point in this appeal is whether the other two reliefs could be granted.

( 2 ) THE plots in dispute are zamindari property. They were purchased in July 1934 by the plaintiffs in the name of Chander Prasad who was then a minor and is the son of Nageshwar bam, plaintiff 1, plaintiff 2 being another son of plaintiff 1. Obviously, the purchase in the name of defendant 2 minor was for the benefit of the entire family and the name of Chander Prasad was a benami. The manager of the famil


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top