SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 156

M.C.DESAI
HARWARI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
YASODA NANDAN

M. C. DESAI, J.


( 1 ) ONE Narsing was being prosecuted (it is not known for what offence) in the Sessions Court and during the pendency of the trial he applied for being released on bail on the ground of his wifes death and the Sessions Judge ordered him to be released on parole for a fortnight on 4-5-1956 on his furnishing two sureties for Rs. 8000/- each to the satisfaction of the committing Magistrate. Accordingly Narsingh produced two sureties, the applicant and another, before the committing Magistrate (Judicial Magistrate, Powayan) on 7-5-56. The applicant executed a bond on that date stating that Narsingh will appear in court every day during the pendency of the commitment proceedings or during his trial in the Court of Session if he was committed there to answer the charge, and that if he failed to appear he will pay the penalty of Rs. 3000/ -. On execution of the bond by the applicant and by another surety Narsingh was released on parole. On 15-5-56 he appeared before the Sessions Judge and applied for bail and the learned Sessions Judge extended the period of parole by one week. No fresh bonds were executed by the appli-cant and the surety on 15-5-56. Narsingh did not app






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top