SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 4

GURTU
AZIMULLA – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ KUMAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBIKA PRASAD, K.L.MISHRA, V.P.MISRA

GURTU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal against the Municipal Board of Azamgarh.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs came to Court on the allegation that the imposition of enhanced octroi duty on heads of cattle by the Municipal Board was illegal and that the same had been wrongly collected from them. The plaintiffs prayed for an injunction restraining the Board from realising the enhanced octroi duty and asked for a decree for refund of the amount wrongly collected from them.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs case was that the enhancement of the octroi duty amounted to imposition of a tax by the Board, but that the enhancement had not been effected in accordance with the provisions of the U. P. Municipalities Act of 1916 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) and that, therefore, they were not liable to pay the octroi duty at the enhanced rate. Principally, the contention of the plaintiffs was that there had been no proper publication of the proposal to enhance the octroi duty in accordance with the provisions of Section 131 of the Act read with section 94 thereof. It was also the plaintiffs case that there was a failure on the part of the Board to pass a special resolution directing imposition of the ta



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top