SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 408

MAHESH CHANDRA
Vishwavir – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mahesh Chandra, J. - This is an application in revision against the conviction of Dr. Vishwavir applicant under, Section 426 Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 40/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.

2. The applicant cut off the electric connection of the sub-meter of Sheo Bhagwan, who was the applicants tenant. Sheo Bhagwan thereupon made a report in the police station and also filed the complaint which has given rise to this application for revision. Both the Courts below have found the applicant guilty.

3. The contentions of the learned counsel for the applicant are two-fold : firstly, that the applicants action is not covered by the definition of mischief because electricity is not movable property and secondly, that it was essentially a civil dispute.

4. As far as the first contention, Section 425, I.P.C., which defines mischief runs as follows :-

"Whoever, with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public; or to any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or ut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top