MUKERJI, TANDON
SITA RAM SAHU – Appellant
Versus
KEDARNATH SAHU – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against an order of the learned. Civil Judge granting time to the plaintiff to make good the deficiency in court-fees after the plaint had been rejected under order 7, Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the plaint had been insufficiently stamped.
( 2 ) IT is necessary to state a few dates in order to appreciate the point that arises for our consideration in this application in revision. On 13-2-1950 a suit was filed on the foot of a mortgage deed. There was report by the Stamp Reporter in respect of some deficiency in regard to court-fees. Time in the first instance was granted by the Court to make good the deficiency upto 16-2-1950. The deficiency was not made good, but an application for further time was made on behalf of the plaintiff. Time was granted. It is not necessary to mention in detail the various occasions on Which time was granted to the plaintiff to make good the deficiency, for we think it sufficient for our purposes to state that the plaintiff was granted several opportunities to make good the deficiency. We may further mention that the plaintiff did not, however, remain inactive complet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.