SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 403

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
H. C. P. TRIPATHI, J.
Gayadin - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2007 of 1962.
Decided On : 22-04-1964

JUDGMENT

H. C. P. Tripathi, J. - These twelve appellants have been convicted finder Section 307/149, I.P.C. and also under Section 324/149, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years under the first count and for one year under the second count. Appellants Gayadin, Tulsiram and Lahuri have further been convicted under Section 148 I.P.C. and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment. The other appellants have further been convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. and sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment. The trial court has, however, directed the sentences to run concurrently.

2. Appellants Gayadin and Lahuri are teal brothers and Panchu and Ram Nath are their uncles. Ram Naresh alias Napai is a cousin of Gayadin. Appellants Tulsiram, Ramdeo and Ramjag are the sons of Nageshar and the other appellants are their partisans and supporters.

3. The prosecution story, in brief, is as follows:

A civil litigation had been going on tor some time between complainant Jagdamba and his brother Karya on the one side and Nageshar and some others on the other for a number of years in respect of a field in the village. Jagdamba and Kariya had lost the case both in the trial court and also in the first appellate court but have filed a second appeal which is pending disposal before the High Court. On account of this litigation Tulsiram and his brothers, who are sons of Nageshar, entertained feeling of deep animosity towards Jagdamba and his brother. A day before the occurrence, Jagdamba had ploughed the field which was the subject-matter of litigation between him and Nageshar. This had provided the appellants with an immediate motive for the commission of the crime.

4. On July 25, 1961 at about 9 a.m. when Jagdamba and Kariya were working in their other field, which is situate to the south of Sheo Dutts plot, all these appellants, out of whom Tulsiram and Lahura were armed with spears and Gayadin with a Pharsa while the others were carrying lathis, reached the field exhorting that Jagdamba and Kariya should be assaulted. Seeing this armed assembly advancing towards them, Kariya and Jagdamba ran for their life raising alarm but they were chased and overtaken in the field of Sheo Dutt by the appellants who surrounded them and severely belaboured them with their respective weapons. On the alarm raised by the victims, Katku, Ram Sabad, Rameshwar, Shyam Lal and Tej Bahadur arrived in the field. Shyamlal tried to intervene but he too was beaten by the appellants. The appellants subsequently fled towards the east.

5. Kariya and Jagdamba were escorted to their house from the field where Jagdamba got a report of the incident scribed by Sarpanch Hiralal and lodged the same at police station Bikapur six miles away on July 25, 1961 at 12.45 P.M. In this report he described the essentials of the prosecution story and mentioned the names of all the appellants as the culprits. On the basis of this report a case was registered and investigation followed.

6. Kariya and Jagdamba were medically examined by Dr. D.N. Srivastava (P. W. 3) on July 25, 1961. Kariya had ten injuries on his person, two of which were incised wounds caused by some sharp-edged weapon while the rest had been caused by a lathi. The patient was semi-conscious at the time of his examination and his pupils were dilated. Jagdamba had nine injuries on his person out of which three were caused by some sharp weapon and the rest by some blunt object as a lathi.

7. Shyam Lal who was examined by Dr. Srivastava on July 26, 1961 was found to have three contusions and two incised wounds on his person. All the injuries were simple except the injury No. 3 of Kariya Singh which was found to be grievous. The duration of the injuries synchronised almost with the time of the incident and in the opinion of the Doctor injury No. 3 of Kariya Singh could be dangerous to life. Kariya Singh had remained in hospital as an indoor patient for about 25 days.

8. At the trial, all the appellants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top