SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 311

D.N.ROY, R.K.CHAUDHARY
BRIJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.Chaturvedi, RAMA

D. N. ROY, J.

( 1 ) BRIJESH Kumar, aged twenty years, and Shiv Narain alias Shiv Charan, aged twenty-eight, were charged along with one Lakhi with offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201, I. P. C. , read with Section 34, I. P. C. Lakhi has been acquitted. The other two have been sentenced to death under the first count and to two years rigorous imprisonment under the second count. They have appealed against their conviction and sentences. Along with their appeal there is the usual reference by the learned Sessions Judge for the confirmation of their death sentences.

( 2 ) THE charge against the appellants was that on the night between the 19th and 20th of June, 1956, between 10 p. m. and 1 a. m. they committed, in furtherance of their common intention, the murder of Battu Mal somewhere in the jungle of village Duhai and they caused the dead body to disappear with the object of escaping punishment.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated the prosecution story was as follows: Lala Battu Mal was a shop-keeper of ghaziabad and was possessed of considerable property. He had brought up Brijesh Kumar and he proposed eventually to adopt him at the time of his marriage. Latterly, friction developed bet






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top