SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
D. N. Roy and R. K. Chowdhry, JJ.
BRIJESH KUMAR - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 424 Of 1957
Decided On : 12/17/1957

Advocates Appeared:
P.C.Chaturvedi, RAMA

The corpus delicti is not essential for a conviction of murder if the other evidence is convincing enough to establish the crime of murder.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE - CORPUS DELICTI - DISCOVERY OF DEAD BODY NOT ESSENTIAL - INCRIMINATING CIRCUMSTANCES - CHAIN OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE - CONVICTION - SENTENCE - EXTREME SENTENCE - LESSER SENTENCE - CONSIDERATIONS.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants, Brijesh Kumar and Shiv Narain, were charged with the murder of Battu Mal and causing his dead body to disappear. The prosecution alleged that the appellants committed the murder in furtherance of their common intention and took the dead body in a car to the Ganges canal where it was thrown into the water. The appellants denied the charges. The trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302 and 201, IPC, read with Section 34, IPC, and sentenced them to death. The appellants appealed against their conviction and sentences.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants had committed the murder of Battu Mal. The Court relied on the following incriminating circumstances: (i) the appellants had a motive to kill Battu Mal as they harboured resentment against him; (ii) the appellants had raised money and purchased a car in preparation for the murder; (iii) the appellants had taken the investigating officer to the spot where the murder had been committed and where human blood was recovered; (iv) the appellants had led the police to the recovery of the clothes they were wearing at the time of the murder, which were stained with human blood; and (v) the appellants had pointed out the place where they had thrown Battu Mal's bunch of keys, which was recovered from a well. The Court also held that the fact that Battu Mal's body was not recovered did not mean that the murder had not taken place.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants had committed the murder of Battu Mal? 2. Whether the appellants were entitled to the lesser sentence instead of the extreme sentence?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants had committed the murder of Battu Mal. The Court relied on the following incriminating circumstances: (i) the appellants had a motive to kill Battu Mal as they harboured resentment against him; (ii) the appellants had raised money and purchased a car in preparation for the murder; (iii) the appellants had taken the investigating officer to the spot where the murder had been committed and where human blood was recovered; (iv) the appellants had led the police to the recovery of the clothes they were wearing at the time of the murder, which were stained with human blood; and (v) the appellants had pointed out the place where they had thrown Battu Mal's bunch of keys, which was recovered from a well. The Court also held that the fact that Battu Mal's body was not recovered did not mean that the murder had not taken place. 2. The Court held that the appellants were entitled to the lesser sentence instead of the extreme sentence. The Court took into consideration the youth of the appellants and the fact that they had committed the murder in vindication of a supposed wrong.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the appeal in part. The conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 201, IPC, were set aside, and they were acquitted of that charge. The conviction of the appellants under Section 302/34, IPC, was maintained, but the sentence was reduced from death to imprisonment for life. The reference for the confirmation of the death sentences of the appellants was rejected.

D. N. ROY, J.

( 1 ) BRIJESH Kumar, aged twenty years, and Shiv Narain alias Shiv Charan, aged twenty-eight, were charged along with one Lakhi with offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201, I. P. C. , read with Section 34, I. P. C. Lakhi has been acquitted. The other two have been sentenced to death under the first count and to two years rigorous imprisonment under the second count. They have appealed against their conviction and sentences. Along with their appeal there is the usual reference by the learned Sessions Judge for the confirmation of their death sentences.

( 2 ) THE charge against the appellants was that on the night between the 19th and 20th of June, 1956, between 10 p. m. and 1 a. m. they committed, in furtherance of their common intention, the murder of Battu Mal somewhere in the jungle of village Duhai and they caused the dead body to disappear with the object of escaping punishment.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated the prosecution story was as follows: Lala Battu Mal was a shop-keeper of ghaziabad and was possessed of considerable property. He had brought up Brijesh Kumar and he proposed eventually to adopt him at the time of his marriage. Latterly, friction developed between the two because Battu Mal objected to Brijess absenting himself from work and indulging in satta gambling. The antagonism was aggravated when Brijesh wanted to marry a Punjabi refugee girl. The proposal was not acceptable to Battu Mal. On 19-6-1956, Battu Mal left Ghaziabad for garhmukhte-shwar to take a bath in the Ganga on the occasion of Ekadashi. It is said that he returned back to Ghaziabad by the night train on the same date at about 10 p. m. and was met at the station by the two appellants along with Lakhi. Shiv Narain appellant and Lakhi were the friends of Brijesh. The prosecution alleged that Battu mal was taken off by them in a car bearing No. U. P. R. 7545, which Brijesh had purchased that very day with the assistance of Shiv Narain. The car was driven to a place near village Duhai about five miles out of Ghaziabad on the Meerut road. Battu Mal. it is said, was then induced to get down from the car and was taken to a field about two furlongs away from the road where he was murdered with a gandasa. It is further said that his dead body was dragged back to the car and was taken to the Ganges canal about four miles further on towards Meerut where it was thrown into the water by Shiv narain and Lakhi along with the gandasa with which the murder had been committed, along also with the umbrella, Jhola and other articles which Battu Mal had taken with him to garhmukhteshwar. Next morning Battu Mals wife Smt. Chaoli became alarmed at the failure of her husband to return home and she sent for Brijesh and asked him to telephone to Battu Mals brother Anand sarup who lived in Hapur.

( 4 ) A belated report Ex. P-13 regarding Battu Mals disappearance was lodged with the police by brijesh on 20-6-1956, at 8 p. m. , but nothing further was done until June 22 when the sub-Inspector commenced investigation and he recorded the statements of certain witnesses. On 25-6-1956, Brijesh is said to have told the Sub-Inspector that he could point out the place where the murder was committed and he led him together with the witnesses to a field near Duhai where blood-stained earth was recovered. Shiv Narain, likewise, is said to have led the Sub-Inspector and the witnesses to the canal from where the gandasa Ex. 10 and Battu Mals umbrella, Jhola and other articles Exs. I to VIII and XI, xii, XVII and XVIII were recovered from the water. On 25-6-1956, the car in which Battu Mal was taken to the scene of murder was also recovered by the Sub-Inspector, on being pointed out by Shiv Narain, from the gher of one Amar Singh in village Ujera, the village to which Shiv narain belongs, situated near the canal about four miles from the main road. At the pointing out of Brijesh the Sub-Inspector, it is further said, recovered in the presence of the witnesses from the dukar





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top