SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 210

V.D.BHARGAVA
SHIVAJI MAHRAJ – Appellant
Versus
LALA BARATI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.D.KHARE, M.L.Trivedi, NIAMATULLAH, S.C.Das, SURAJ SAHAI

V. D. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs who had brought a suit for proprietary possession of the land (for clarity, which was marked in the Commissioners map), by demolition of certain constructions made thereon, on the allegations that that plot of land belonged to Shivaji and the defendants have wrongfully encroached upon that land and had made constructions in December 1945.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs in the suit were Shivaji through Babu Ram, acting as next friend of plaintiff 1, claiming to be its Pujari and there were 9 other Hindus who had claimed to file the Suit in representative capacity and had taken permission of the Court under Order 1, Rule 8, Civil P. C. The existence of a temple of Shivaji in Gurahi Bazar, Mohalla Saadatganj, cannot be denied. It has been there for a very long time. On behalf of the plaintiffs it was alleged that it was a public temple and it stood on plot No. 1944 which number includes the land in dispute also. This land was dedicated to plff. 1, Shivaji from time immemorial and the dedication was sought to be proved by long user and it was said that plaintiff 1 had derived title on account of this dedication by long user.





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top