DESAI
SETH JUGMENDAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE applicants are being prosecuted under Section 120b, I. P. C. and Rules 81 (4) and 121, defence of India Rules, for entering into a conspiracy and infringing the provisions of the non-ferrous Metals Control Order of 1942. They are said to have committed the offence in the years 1943 to 1945. The offence remained under investigation for a long period and the prosecution was launched against them on 16-1-1950. On 19-4-1950 they pressed before the trial ct. that their prosecution could not be continued for various reasons, the most important being that the Defence of India Act and Rules have expired and the Govt. of India Act, 1935 has been repealed by the Const. The trial Ct. held that there was no bar to the continuance of the prosecution and refused their request to quash the proceedings. They went up in revision against this order to the Ses. J. The learned Sess. J. contented himself with pouring encomia on the trial ct. for its elaborate order and refused to do anything in the matter. So they have come up to this ct. in revision.
( 2 ) THE control order that is said to have been infringed by the applicants was made in exercise of the powers conferred by the Def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.