SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 213

SANKAR SARAN, BIND BASNI PRASAD
JAI DAYAL PEAREY LAL – Appellant
Versus
CHUNNI LAL PARSOTAM DASS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.AGARWAL, Gopi Nath Kunzru, J.Swarup, SATISH CHANDRA

SANKAR SARAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision against an order by the Civil Judge of Kanpur reversing the decree of the trial Court and remanding the case to the Court below for ordering an award to be filed and for making it the rule of the Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-applicant Jai Dayal Pearey Lal and the defendant opposite party Chunni Lal parsotam Das are two firms, members of the Kanpur Sugar Merchants Association here-after to be referred to as the Association. There was a dispute between the parties and according to the rules and bye-laws of the Association it was referred to arbitration. On 7th May 1941 one Ram sahai was appointed the sole arbitrator by the parties and he accepted that office. Earn Sahai could not, however, finish the work of arbitration. On 2nd September 1943, the firm Chunni Lal parsotam Das nominated one Charan Das as its arbitrator. On 3rd September 1943, the Secretary of the Association sent a notice to the applicant firm Jai Dayal Pearey Lal that Charan Das was appointed the sole arbitrator. The applicant protested against Charan Das being appointed the sole arbitrator. Thereupon, on 9th September 1943 the Secretary of Association gave three days time to t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top