SANKAR SARAN, BIND BASNI PRASAD
JAI DAYAL PEAREY LAL – Appellant
Versus
CHUNNI LAL PARSOTAM DASS – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision against an order by the Civil Judge of Kanpur reversing the decree of the trial Court and remanding the case to the Court below for ordering an award to be filed and for making it the rule of the Court.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff-applicant Jai Dayal Pearey Lal and the defendant opposite party Chunni Lal parsotam Das are two firms, members of the Kanpur Sugar Merchants Association here-after to be referred to as the Association. There was a dispute between the parties and according to the rules and bye-laws of the Association it was referred to arbitration. On 7th May 1941 one Ram sahai was appointed the sole arbitrator by the parties and he accepted that office. Earn Sahai could not, however, finish the work of arbitration. On 2nd September 1943, the firm Chunni Lal parsotam Das nominated one Charan Das as its arbitrator. On 3rd September 1943, the Secretary of the Association sent a notice to the applicant firm Jai Dayal Pearey Lal that Charan Das was appointed the sole arbitrator. The applicant protested against Charan Das being appointed the sole arbitrator. Thereupon, on 9th September 1943 the Secretary of Association gave three days time to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.