( 1 ) THESE appeals have been referred to the Full Bench for decision by one of us, as they raise questions upon which there is conflict of view between the decisions of the Allahabad High court as it existed before the amalgamation and the decisions of the late Chief Court of Avadh. Before addressing our-selves to these questions, it will be convenient) to give facts of each case separately.

( 2 ) ONE Tika Ram was the owner of Khata No. 54 corresponding to 17 (new), which included plot no. 1607 in the agricultural area of Hardoi. Tika Ram survived by his four sons, Jutta who died issueless, Nimman Lal, Jai Lal and Chunni Lal. Chunni Lal died leaving a son Gur Sahai, who left a widow Suraj Kuar, defendant 1 in the case Nimman Lal and Jai Lal transferred their entire share in the property of their father to Chhedi Lal and Sheo Narain, On 5-6-1929, Chunni Lal sold a specific share to Chhedi Lal and Sheo Narain. This share included plot No. 1607. Suraj kuar and one Chhotey Lal started raising constructions upon this plot whereupon Chhedi Lal and sheo Narain tried to stop them on 6-7-1941, but they paid no heed and went on with the constructions. Chhedi Lal and Sheo Na