RAJIV SHARMA
Citi Hotel – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Lucknow Divn. , Lucknow – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manoj Kumar Dwivedi appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia assailed the order dated 18th March. 2008 passed by the Commissioner. Lucknow Division. Lucknow inter alia on the ground that the impugned judgment not only suffers from infirmities but is in transgression of the authority vested in him inasmuch as the provisions of the Electric-city Supply Code 2-5 were not adverted to and without adverting the same, the impugned order has been passed.
3. Put it briefly, the essential facts of the case are that the petitioner is a partnership firm carrying on its business under the name c and style of M/s. Citi Hotel, Lucknow, and for running the hotel the electrical energy was required and as such connection for supply of electrical energy was applied in the requisite format, which was sanctioned with a load of 40 KW. A meter was also installed in the premises of the hotel. The hotel was utilizing about 36.110 KW load out of the sanctioned load and was paying the bill regularly. In the hotel, the management was also running a restaurant. One Sri S. C. Jain, Junior Enginee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.